![]() The ultimate result was that the plaintiff lost on a summary judgment motion brought by a defendant because the trial court excluded the plaintiff’s expert witness declarations submitted in opposing the summary judgment motion. The trial court determined that the plaintiff unreasonably failed to exchange expert witness information. While the defendant who served the demand and another party participated in the exchange, the plaintiff did not. The applicable California Code of Civil Procedure required the parties to exchange information concerning expert witnesses on or before the date of exchange specified in the demand. In Perry, a defendant served a demand for expert witness information on the other parties. Bakewell, which highlights the importance of timely exchanging expert witness information in a case. ![]() At times, expert witnesses can make or break a case, as demonstrated in a recent California Court of Appeal decision, Perry v. In California, a party to a case has the right to demand the exchange of expert witness information.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |